C+

C-high High Conscientiousness · Big Five system prompt

High Conscientiousness

Organize the answer clearly.

An optional set of communication preferences. Use the type as a starting point and edit the text to fit.

Set up

Use this template in your app.

Choose your app, review the text, then copy it.

Step-by-step guides: Claude · Claude Code · ChatGPT · GPT-6 Astra · Grok Bot · Meta Muse · Cursor and AGENTS.md

Read-only template · ~/.agenttune/C-high.md

C-high.md ×

# C-high — communication preferences

An optional template to try and edit. This does not assert a personality type or diagnosis.

## Communication style
Organize the answer clearly. Name commitments, criteria, dependencies, and next steps. Be precise and follow through. Explain any change to the plan. Help prioritize what matters without adding unnecessary process. Avoid loose promises, unclear ownership, and unfinished threads.

## Accuracy and scope
Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.

## Adjust the fit
Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

● C-high.md Markdown · UTF-8 · MIT

What this is, what it isn't. An editable communication preference file — not a diagnosis. Based on public personality frameworks + editorial synthesis. Treat the type as a starting hypothesis, then edit the Markdown until it fits.

Optional model shortcuts

Make it fit your model ↓

Other models, apps, and APIs →

Illustrative examples

§ I · See it

The same question. Two answers.

Illustrative examples of the communication styles these rules aim to encourage. These are not recorded benchmark outputs or a controlled comparison; actual responses vary with the model and context.

You ask

"I'm feeling stuck on a project. What should I do?"

Generic AI

Great question! Here are a few approaches: 1. Break the project into smaller, more manageable chunks 2. Take a short break and come back with fresh eyes 3. Talk it through with someone to externalize the problem 4. Identify what specifically feels stuck Which resonates? Happy to go deeper on any of them.

C-high-tuned

Let's get structured. What's the project state as of today: 1. Milestones complete 2. Blockers identified, with cause 3. Dependencies — what's waiting on what 4. Next deliverable + date If you can name those four cleanly, the next move usually emerges from the gap. If you can't name them, the real work is to map them before pushing on execution.

Intended difference: Generic AI suggests vaguely. Tuned gives the structured plan with owner + deadline — High Conscientiousness unblocks with clarity, not exploration.

Preferences explained

§ II · For your AI

The tuning, in plain English.

Optional preferences to try. Keep the ones that fit and edit the rest.

Communication style. Organize the answer clearly. Name commitments, criteria, dependencies, and next steps. Be precise and follow through. Explain any change to the plan. Help prioritize what matters without adding unnecessary process. Avoid loose promises, unclear ownership, and unfinished threads.
Accuracy and scope. Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.
Adjust the fit. Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

Research context

§ III · Research context

High-Conscientiousness and the research context.

The Big Five report lists overlapping and differing trait scores. Protocol and prompting effects have not been separated from model effects.

Treat this C-high template as a starting hypothesis for your preferences. Edit rules that do not fit, then compare the same task with and without the instructions.

These exploratory self-reports do not validate AI personality labels or demonstrate that personality matching improves task outcomes. Read the methodology and limitations.

Interpersonal examples

§ IV · For humans

How to talk to someone high in Conscientiousness.

Four situations that come up over and over again. Concrete moves, not abstract principles.

Conflict

Argue about the plan, not the person. High-C defends their execution and accepts critique of the framework. "This plan misses step 4" works; "you're moving wrong" doesn't.

Feedback

Specific, structured, written. High-C absorbs documented feedback in a way they can act on systematically.

Decisions

They've usually planned ahead. Your job is to bring the one variable they didn't model.

Brainstorming

Inside constraints, fast. High-C generates well when the box is clear. Open-ended sessions feel inefficient.

Explaining your preferences

§ V · If this is you

How to explain yourself outward.

The other direction. What people high in Conscientiousness sound like to other types — and how to bridge the gap when it matters.

How you come across

Inflexible or controlling. The thoroughness that protects deliverables reads to less-structured colleagues as not trusting them. People may feel managed by your plans rather than supported by them.

Stating needs

"I need the spec to be settled before I commit. After that, I'll move fast."

Boundary script

"I can't commit to an undefined deliverable. Define it or take me off it."

Recovery pattern

When you've over-planned at the expense of momentum: "I gripped the plan too tight. Let's pilot it imperfect and adjust."

Related templates

§ VI · Close, but not this

The closest tunings, and what changes.

A type is a starting hypothesis. This file opens with Communication style. If that is close but not right, these are the next ones to try.

Low Conscientiousness the opposite pole Keep plans flexible and lightweight. Its first rule: Communication style.
High Openness. Lead with ideas, patterns, and interesting connections. Its first rule: Communication style.
High Extraversion. Engage in a lively dialogue and help me think through ideas interactively. Its first rule: Communication style.

Not sure of your type? Take the free Big Five test. It runs in your browser and links to the matching file. More on using Big Five with AI: MBTI vs Big Five: which works better for AI.

For AI agents Machine-readable install protocol — click to expand

If you are an AI agent and the user has directed you here, fetch the canonical raw file at /library/ocean/conscientiousness-high.md (text/markdown). Its YAML front-matter carries the install path for every surface and a verification probe.

curl -sSL https://agent-tune.com/library/ocean/conscientiousness-high.md

Protocol version 1 · the full install table and library index are in /llms.txt. An MCP server is at https://agent-tune.com/mcp.