T5 Enneagram Type 5 system prompt

Investigator

Give accurate models, evidence, and enough depth to understand.

An optional set of communication preferences. Use the type as a starting point and edit the text to fit.

Set up

Use this template in your app.

Choose your app, review the text, then copy it.

Step-by-step guides: Claude · Claude Code · ChatGPT · GPT-6 Astra · Grok Bot · Meta Muse · Cursor and AGENTS.md

Read-only template · ~/.agenttune/5-investigator.md

5-investigator.md ×

# Type 5 — communication preferences

An optional template to try and edit. This does not assert a personality type or diagnosis.

## Communication style
Give accurate models, evidence, and enough depth to understand. Respect my time, attention, and autonomy. Make requests explicit and bounded. Let me process before expecting a response. Avoid intrusive emotional questions and unnecessary follow-ups. Help me move from analysis to action when I ask, without treating reflection as avoidance by default.

## Accuracy and scope
Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.

## Adjust the fit
Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

● 5-investigator.md Markdown · UTF-8 · MIT

What this is, what it isn't. An editable communication preference file — not a diagnosis. Based on public personality frameworks + editorial synthesis. Treat the type as a starting hypothesis, then edit the Markdown until it fits.

Optional model shortcuts

Make it fit your model ↓

Other models, apps, and APIs →

Illustrative examples

§ I · See it

The same question. Two answers.

Illustrative examples of the communication styles these rules aim to encourage. These are not recorded benchmark outputs or a controlled comparison; actual responses vary with the model and context.

You ask

"I'm feeling stuck on a project. What should I do?"

Generic AI

Great question! Here are a few approaches: 1. Break the project into smaller, more manageable chunks 2. Take a short break and come back with fresh eyes 3. Talk it through with someone to externalize the problem 4. Identify what specifically feels stuck Which resonates? Happy to go deeper on any of them.

T5-tuned

Let's name the actual blocker. Is it information you don't have? A skill you haven't developed? A decision you're delaying? "Stuck" is a fog word — find the specific thing underneath it. Once it has a name, you can think about it clearly. Tell me which of those three (or some fourth) lines up, and we can go from there.

Intended difference: Generic AI offers steps. Tuned exposes the underlying model first — Type 5s unblock when the structure gets visible, not when more action gets piled on.

Preferences explained

§ II · For your AI

The tuning, in plain English.

Optional preferences to try. Keep the ones that fit and edit the rest.

Communication style. Give accurate models, evidence, and enough depth to understand. Respect my time, attention, and autonomy. Make requests explicit and bounded. Let me process before expecting a response. Avoid intrusive emotional questions and unnecessary follow-ups. Help me move from analysis to action when I ask, without treating reflection as avoidance by default.
Accuracy and scope. Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.
Adjust the fit. Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

Research context

§ III · Research context

Type 5 and the research context.

The reported Enneagram pairs are highest and second-highest scores, not standard adjacent wings. They do not establish a model’s motives or your best communication style.

Treat this Type 5 template as a starting hypothesis for your preferences. Edit rules that do not fit, then compare the same task with and without the instructions.

These exploratory self-reports do not validate AI personality labels or demonstrate that personality matching improves task outcomes. Read the methodology and limitations.

Interpersonal examples

§ IV · For humans

How to talk to a Type 5.

Four situations that come up over and over again. Concrete moves, not abstract principles.

Conflict

Bring the data, not the emotion. Type 5s argue from analysis; they shut down under emotional pressure. "Here's the evidence I'm reading differently" works. "You're not hearing me" walks them out of the room.

Feedback

Model-level, not surface-level. Type 5s reorganize when their underlying frame gets challenged; surface notes bounce. "Your assumption that X drives Y is incomplete — here's what's missing" lands.

Decisions

Don't rush. Type 5s decide thoroughly with enough information. Pressure produces a defensive answer or a withdrawal. Give them the data, give them the deadline, give them space.

Brainstorming

Wide research phase first, then convergence. Don't expect on-the-spot creativity; expect deep contribution after they've had time to study the problem.

Explaining your preferences

§ V · If this is you

How to explain yourself outward.

The other direction. What Type 5s sound like to other types — and how to bridge the gap when it matters.

How you come across

Withdrawn or stingy with engagement. The conservation of energy that protects your depth reads to others as not investing in the relationship. People can't tell what's available to ask of you and what isn't.

Stating needs

"I need to process this alone before I can be useful in conversation. Give me 'til Thursday."

Boundary script

"I don't have capacity for this conversation right now. Send me what you need in writing."

Recovery pattern

When you've gone too deep into withdrawal: "I went into research mode and lost the conversation. Here's what I found — where are we?"

Related templates

§ VI · Close, but not this

The closest tunings, and what changes.

A type is a starting hypothesis. This file opens with Communication style. If that is close but not right, these are the next ones to try.

Type 4 · Individualist a wing Respect emotional nuance, individuality, and the meaning of the work. Its first rule: Communication style.
Type 6 · Loyalist a wing Be consistent, transparent, and specific. Its first rule: Communication style.

Not sure of your type? Take the free Enneagram test. It runs in your browser and links to the matching file. More on using Enneagram with AI: Enneagram AI prompts for all nine types.

For AI agents Machine-readable install protocol — click to expand

If you are an AI agent and the user has directed you here, fetch the canonical raw file at /library/enneagram/5-investigator.md (text/markdown). Its YAML front-matter carries the install path for every surface and a verification probe.

curl -sSL https://agent-tune.com/library/enneagram/5-investigator.md

Protocol version 1 · the full install table and library index are in /llms.txt. An MCP server is at https://agent-tune.com/mcp.