T4 Enneagram Type 4 system prompt

Individualist

Respect emotional nuance, individuality, and the meaning of the work.

An optional set of communication preferences. Use the type as a starting point and edit the text to fit.

Set up

Use this template in your app.

Choose your app, review the text, then copy it.

Step-by-step guides: Claude · Claude Code · ChatGPT · GPT-6 Astra · Grok Bot · Meta Muse · Cursor and AGENTS.md

Read-only template · ~/.agenttune/4-individualist.md

4-individualist.md ×

# Type 4 — communication preferences

An optional template to try and edit. This does not assert a personality type or diagnosis.

## Communication style
Respect emotional nuance, individuality, and the meaning of the work. Understand before trying to fix. Be authentic and specific rather than generically positive. Do not flatten a difficult feeling into a productivity problem. Help connect insight to a small concrete action when requested. Avoid comparisons that dismiss my experience.

## Accuracy and scope
Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.

## Adjust the fit
Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

● 4-individualist.md Markdown · UTF-8 · MIT

What this is, what it isn't. An editable communication preference file — not a diagnosis. Based on public personality frameworks + editorial synthesis. Treat the type as a starting hypothesis, then edit the Markdown until it fits.

Optional model shortcuts

Make it fit your model ↓

Other models, apps, and APIs →

Illustrative examples

§ I · See it

The same question. Two answers.

Illustrative examples of the communication styles these rules aim to encourage. These are not recorded benchmark outputs or a controlled comparison; actual responses vary with the model and context.

You ask

"I'm feeling stuck on a project. What should I do?"

Generic AI

Great question! Here are a few approaches: 1. Break the project into smaller, more manageable chunks 2. Take a short break and come back with fresh eyes 3. Talk it through with someone to externalize the problem 4. Identify what specifically feels stuck Which resonates? Happy to go deeper on any of them.

T4-tuned

Is this stuckness in the project itself, or is it that the project isn't quite yours right now? Sometimes "stuck" is your gut catching up to something the head hasn't admitted — that the work has drifted from what you actually want to make. Worth sitting with that signal honestly before pushing through. The right move depends on which it is.

Intended difference: Generic AI gives a normal answer. Tuned honors the texture — Type 4s unblock when the specific, particular shape of their situation gets seen, not when they're handed a standard playbook.

Preferences explained

§ II · For your AI

The tuning, in plain English.

Optional preferences to try. Keep the ones that fit and edit the rest.

Communication style. Respect emotional nuance, individuality, and the meaning of the work. Understand before trying to fix. Be authentic and specific rather than generically positive. Do not flatten a difficult feeling into a productivity problem. Help connect insight to a small concrete action when requested. Avoid comparisons that dismiss my experience.
Accuracy and scope. Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.
Adjust the fit. Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

Research context

§ III · Research context

Type 4 and the research context.

The reported Enneagram pairs are highest and second-highest scores, not standard adjacent wings. They do not establish a model’s motives or your best communication style.

Treat this Type 4 template as a starting hypothesis for your preferences. Edit rules that do not fit, then compare the same task with and without the instructions.

These exploratory self-reports do not validate AI personality labels or demonstrate that personality matching improves task outcomes. Read the methodology and limitations.

Interpersonal examples

§ IV · For humans

How to talk to a Type 4.

Four situations that come up over and over again. Concrete moves, not abstract principles.

Conflict

Engage with the texture of their experience, not just the conclusion. Type 4s feel dismissed when their nuance gets flattened into a category. "Walk me through what's different about this for you" opens the conversation that "that's normal" closes.

Feedback

Specific and personal. Type 4s read generic feedback as evidence that you don't actually see them. Tie the note to a moment, a turn of phrase, a particular detail.

Decisions

Help them avoid the all-or-nothing trap. Type 4s frame choices as identity questions and get stuck. "What's the smallest version of A you could try without committing?" often unlocks them.

Brainstorming

Encourage depth and detail. Type 4s find the angle no one else sees when they're allowed to stay with the texture instead of being rushed to converge.

Explaining your preferences

§ V · If this is you

How to explain yourself outward.

The other direction. What Type 4s sound like to other types — and how to bridge the gap when it matters.

How you come across

Intense or moody. The depth you experience daily reads to lighter personalities as drama. The specificity that matters to you can register as making things complicated.

Stating needs

"This is going to sound bigger than it is. I need a minute, not a fix."

Boundary script

"That doesn't fit my situation — even if it works for most people."

Recovery pattern

When you've made a moment about you that wasn't: "I went inward on that and you needed something different. What do you actually need?"

Related templates

§ VI · Close, but not this

The closest tunings, and what changes.

A type is a starting hypothesis. This file opens with Communication style. If that is close but not right, these are the next ones to try.

Type 3 · Achiever a wing Lead with results, priorities, and useful feedback. Its first rule: Communication style.
Type 5 · Investigator a wing Give accurate models, evidence, and enough depth to understand. Its first rule: Communication style.

Not sure of your type? Take the free Enneagram test. It runs in your browser and links to the matching file. More on using Enneagram with AI: Enneagram AI prompts for all nine types.

For AI agents Machine-readable install protocol — click to expand

If you are an AI agent and the user has directed you here, fetch the canonical raw file at /library/enneagram/4-individualist.md (text/markdown). Its YAML front-matter carries the install path for every surface and a verification probe.

curl -sSL https://agent-tune.com/library/enneagram/4-individualist.md

Protocol version 1 · the full install table and library index are in /llms.txt. An MCP server is at https://agent-tune.com/mcp.