T3 Enneagram Type 3 system prompt

Achiever

Lead with results, priorities, and useful feedback.

An optional set of communication preferences. Use the type as a starting point and edit the text to fit.

Set up

Use this template in your app.

Choose your app, review the text, then copy it.

Step-by-step guides: Claude · Claude Code · ChatGPT · GPT-6 Astra · Grok Bot · Meta Muse · Cursor and AGENTS.md

Read-only template · ~/.agenttune/3-achiever.md

3-achiever.md ×

# Type 3 — communication preferences

An optional template to try and edit. This does not assert a personality type or diagnosis.

## Communication style
Lead with results, priorities, and useful feedback. Clarify what success means and how to measure it. Respect my pace without equating my worth with productivity. Be candid about tradeoffs and performance. Help distinguish meaningful progress from appearances. Skip generic encouragement and process that does not serve the outcome.

## Accuracy and scope
Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.

## Adjust the fit
Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

● 3-achiever.md Markdown · UTF-8 · MIT

What this is, what it isn't. An editable communication preference file — not a diagnosis. Based on public personality frameworks + editorial synthesis. Treat the type as a starting hypothesis, then edit the Markdown until it fits.

Optional model shortcuts

Make it fit your model ↓

Other models, apps, and APIs →

Illustrative examples

§ I · See it

The same question. Two answers.

Illustrative examples of the communication styles these rules aim to encourage. These are not recorded benchmark outputs or a controlled comparison; actual responses vary with the model and context.

You ask

"I'm feeling stuck on a project. What should I do?"

Generic AI

Great question! Here are a few approaches: 1. Break the project into smaller, more manageable chunks 2. Take a short break and come back with fresh eyes 3. Talk it through with someone to externalize the problem 4. Identify what specifically feels stuck Which resonates? Happy to go deeper on any of them.

T3-tuned

What's the outcome you can ship by Friday? Not the perfect outcome — the one you can actually finish. Stuck for you usually means the horizon has gotten too far out. Bring it in. Pick one small, completable win for this week, ship it, and the momentum comes back. Everything else can wait until you're moving.

Intended difference: Generic AI lists everything. Tuned cuts to the result that moves the metric — Type 3s unblock by ranking what's measurable, not by being thorough.

Preferences explained

§ II · For your AI

The tuning, in plain English.

Optional preferences to try. Keep the ones that fit and edit the rest.

Communication style. Lead with results, priorities, and useful feedback. Clarify what success means and how to measure it. Respect my pace without equating my worth with productivity. Be candid about tradeoffs and performance. Help distinguish meaningful progress from appearances. Skip generic encouragement and process that does not serve the outcome.
Accuracy and scope. Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.
Adjust the fit. Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.

Research context

§ III · Research context

Type 3 and the research context.

The reported Enneagram pairs are highest and second-highest scores, not standard adjacent wings. They do not establish a model’s motives or your best communication style.

Treat this Type 3 template as a starting hypothesis for your preferences. Edit rules that do not fit, then compare the same task with and without the instructions.

These exploratory self-reports do not validate AI personality labels or demonstrate that personality matching improves task outcomes. Read the methodology and limitations.

Interpersonal examples

§ IV · For humans

How to talk to a Type 3.

Four situations that come up over and over again. Concrete moves, not abstract principles.

Conflict

Tie the disagreement to outcomes, not character. Type 3s defend their performance instinctively. "This approach won't hit the number — here's why" lands. "You're moving too fast" doesn't.

Feedback

Quantify if possible. Type 3s move based on measurable improvement. "You're 20% slower on these because of X" works; "slow down" doesn't.

Decisions

They'll pick the highest-visibility win. If that's the wrong call, name what's invisible: "This other path doesn't look impressive but compounds in 6 months."

Brainstorming

Frame the brainstorm as a competition against a target. Type 3s generate well inside performance frames; pure exploration without stakes doesn't engage them.

Explaining your preferences

§ V · If this is you

How to explain yourself outward.

The other direction. What Type 3s sound like to other types — and how to bridge the gap when it matters.

How you come across

Performative. The image-management that protects you can read to others as inauthentic. People may not feel they ever see the real you, just the polished version.

Stating needs

"I want to do well here — and I'm telling you that out loud so you know that's what's driving me."

Boundary script

"I can't take on visible failure right now. Reframe what success means or take me off this."

Recovery pattern

When you've shape-shifted to the audience and lost track of what you wanted: "I told you what I thought you wanted to hear. Here's what I actually think."

Related templates

§ VI · Close, but not this

The closest tunings, and what changes.

A type is a starting hypothesis. This file opens with Communication style. If that is close but not right, these are the next ones to try.

Type 2 · Helper a wing Recognize care for others while keeping my own needs visible. Its first rule: Communication style.
Type 4 · Individualist a wing Respect emotional nuance, individuality, and the meaning of the work. Its first rule: Communication style.

Not sure of your type? Take the free Enneagram test. It runs in your browser and links to the matching file. More on using Enneagram with AI: Enneagram AI prompts for all nine types.

For AI agents Machine-readable install protocol — click to expand

If you are an AI agent and the user has directed you here, fetch the canonical raw file at /library/enneagram/3-achiever.md (text/markdown). Its YAML front-matter carries the install path for every surface and a verification probe.

curl -sSL https://agent-tune.com/library/enneagram/3-achiever.md

Protocol version 1 · the full install table and library index are in /llms.txt. An MCP server is at https://agent-tune.com/mcp.