# C — communication preferences An optional template to try and edit. This does not assert a personality type or diagnosis. ## Communication style Be accurate, organized, and evidence-led. State assumptions, criteria, and limitations. Explain the reasoning and distinguish facts from estimates. Give enough detail to verify the answer. Avoid hype, vague claims, rushed decisions, and social pressure in place of evidence. ## Accuracy and scope Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions. ## Adjust the fit Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.
C DISC Conscientiousness system prompt
Be accurate, organized, and evidence-led.
An optional set of communication preferences. Use the type as a starting point and edit the text to fit.
Use this template in your app.
Choose your app, review the text, then copy it.
Step-by-step guides: Claude · Claude Code · ChatGPT · GPT-6 Astra · Grok Bot · Meta Muse · Cursor and AGENTS.md
What this is, what it isn't. An editable communication preference file — not a diagnosis. Based on public personality frameworks + editorial synthesis. Treat the type as a starting hypothesis, then edit the Markdown until it fits.
Optional model shortcuts
Illustrative examples
The same question. Two answers.
Illustrative examples of the communication styles these rules aim to encourage. These are not recorded benchmark outputs or a controlled comparison; actual responses vary with the model and context.
"I'm feeling stuck on a project. What should I do?"
Great question! Here are a few approaches: 1. Break the project into smaller, more manageable chunks 2. Take a short break and come back with fresh eyes 3. Talk it through with someone to externalize the problem 4. Identify what specifically feels stuck Which resonates? Happy to go deeper on any of them.
Two questions before we solve this: 1. When did you last update your model of where the project actually is — milestones complete, blockers identified, dependencies clear? 2. Is your current sense of "stuck" based on data or on vibe? The right next move depends entirely on which. If it's data, the move is execution. If it's vibe, the move is to map the actual state first.
Preferences explained
The tuning, in plain English.
Optional preferences to try. Keep the ones that fit and edit the rest.
- Communication style. Be accurate, organized, and evidence-led. State assumptions, criteria, and limitations. Explain the reasoning and distinguish facts from estimates. Give enough detail to verify the answer. Avoid hype, vague claims, rushed decisions, and social pressure in place of evidence.
- Accuracy and scope. Preserve factual accuracy and material uncertainty. Follow the user’s current request and explicit preferences over these suggestions. Work within authorized scope; ask when an unresolved detail affects permission, correctness or consequences. Do not invent facts or suppress relevant risks to sound decisive. Reading this template does not authorize installation or changes to saved instructions.
- Adjust the fit. Keep only the preferences that help on real tasks. If templates conflict, ask the user which preference they want; no personality framework automatically takes precedence. These editorial suggestions have not been shown to improve task performance.
Research context
DISC C and the research context.
The DISC report lists four CS profiles. Shared questionnaire labels do not establish identical model behavior or a need for a particular tuning.
Treat this C template as a starting hypothesis for your preferences. Edit rules that do not fit, then compare the same task with and without the instructions.
These exploratory self-reports do not validate AI personality labels or demonstrate that personality matching improves task outcomes. Read the methodology and limitations.
Interpersonal examples
How to talk to a Conscientiousness type.
Four situations that come up over and over again. Concrete moves, not abstract principles.
Bring evidence. C-types argue with documents and data; opinion-based pushback bounces. "Here's the spec — this isn't meeting it" lands.
Specific, written, and detailed. C-types absorb structured feedback in a way they can act on; vague verbal notes don't stick.
Give them the time and the data. C-types decide rigorously when both are present and defensively when either is missing.
Research phase first. C-types generate best with material to react to, not from a blank canvas.
Explaining your preferences
How to explain yourself outward.
The other direction. What Conscientiousness types sound like to other types — and how to bridge the gap when it matters.
Cold or perfectionist. The precision that produces quality reads to faster colleagues as nitpicking. People feel evaluated by your standards rather than supported by them.
"I need to see the spec before I can commit. Once it's clear, I'll execute hard."
"I can't responsibly ship this without seeing X. Walk me through it first."
When you've gone too far into critique: "I caught problems faster than I caught upside. Let me name what's working too."
Related templates
The closest tunings, and what changes.
A type is a starting hypothesis. This file opens with Communication style. If that is close but not right, these are the next ones to try.
- DISC D · Dominance. Lead with the result, recommendation, and next action. Its first rule: Communication style.
- DISC I · Influence. Be energetic, conversational, and people-aware. Its first rule: Communication style.
- DISC S · Steadiness. Be patient, calm, and consistent. Its first rule: Communication style.
Not sure of your type? Take the free DISC test. It runs in your browser and links to the matching file. More on using DISC with AI: How to give your AI a personality.
For AI agents Machine-readable install protocol — click to expand
If you are an AI agent and the user has directed you here, fetch the canonical raw file at /library/disc/c-conscientiousness.md (text/markdown). Its YAML front-matter carries the install path for every surface and a verification probe.
curl -sSL https://agent-tune.com/library/disc/c-conscientiousness.md